Support It

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 26 September 2013

How Early Cells May Have Got Complex DNA

Posted on 14:26 by Unknown
DNA-grabbing bacteria hint at early phase of evolution - life - 26 September 2013 - New Scientist



How did the simplest cells early in the evolution of life build their DNA?



It has always been assumed that DNA evolved by three separate processes:

  1. DNA transfer between living organisms.
  2. Sexual reproduction where DNA is shuffled with that of a partner to produce descendants with different combinations.
  3. Random mutation with natural selection sieving out the less fit mutations and favouring the more fit ones.


Now we can add a fourth: mopping up pieces of DNA from dead and decaying organisms and possibly viruses and incorporating them into the genome where they will be replicated in future generations.



DNA is notoriously stable as a molecule, which is why it can be recovered from long-dead bodies, dried up smears of body fluids and the partially fossilised remains of Neanderthals, mammoths and ancestral horses. Genetic material would have been more abundant in the environment in which early cells were evolving than in an adolescent boy's bedroom, especially since, prior to the evolution of photosynthesis, there would have been very low levels of free oxygen.



Søren Overballe-Petersen of the Natural History Museum of Denmark in Copenhagen found that when he fed fragments of DNA to a culture of Acinetobacter baylyi they were passively absorbed. They even absorbed fragments of 43,000 year-old mammoth DNA. The fact that this was a passive process suggests it may be a very primitive ability. By contrast, assimilating pieces of DNA passed across from another microorganism takes at least 40 genes.



So we have the possibility that very early cells acquired pieces of DNA from that sloshing about in their environment and that natural selection did the rest, sieving out those new combinations which were less successful at surviving to replicate and allowing through those which gave most descendants. With possibly billions of cells taking part in this process, it would have very quickly led to the accumulation of more and more complex and successful genomes. And of course the most successful organisms left more DNA fragments for others to mop up when they eventually died, so 'success' was not only inherited by descendants but could be picked up by the descendants of less successful organisms.



References:
Michael Marshall, DNA-grabbing bacteria hint at early phase of evolution, New Scientist Magazine issue 2936, 26 September 2013.



'via Blog this'




Share
Twitter

Tweet
StumbleUpon

Reddit

submit to reddit


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Evolution | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Evolution Of A Plague of Locusts
    Magicicada adults and final stage nymphs. Photograph by Arthur D. Guilani If it hasn't happened already, and you live in the Eastern US...
  • Favourite Oxymorons - Religious Logic
    One of the more absurd arguments for religion (in this case Christianity) I've seen today is: "If God doesn't exist then there...
  • The Power Of The Story
    Once upon a time, in a continent not far away, there dwelt a puny ape who had learnt to walk upright so it could see further than other men ...
  • Why Did The Believer Cross The Road?
    Faith: The sure and certain way to know that ever other faith is wrong. Faith is just not a sensible way to live your life. If you tried to...
  • Christians - Try Not To Think About Matthew.
    What was it with Matthew, or whoever it was writing the stuff attributed to him in the Bible? Later on in the Bible, Matthew seems to presen...
  • What is Reddit FOR Exactly?
    Normally, I confine this blog to articles dealing with all aspects of religion, science as it relates to the claims of religion, and occasio...
  • A New Angle On Sex For Creationists
    The extent to which some males will go for sex is amazing, and this has nothing at all to do with dangly things - only females have these an...
  • Christianity Is No Excuse - ECHR
    European Court of Human Rights refuses to hear appeals in three ‘Christian persecution’ cases » British Humanist Association : Congratulatio...
  • Religion Kills - Mormon Massacre
    The Mountain Meadow Massacre To illustrate how readily and easily religions turn their followers into killers in the name of their gods, her...
  • Are The Bible's Publishers Breaking The Law?
    In England we have the Serious Crimes Act 2007 Part 2 of which came into force in 2008. Section 59 removed the Common Law offence of incit...

Categories

  • Agnosticism
  • Anthropology
  • Apologetics
  • Art
  • Astronomy
  • Atheism
  • Bible
  • Bible Contradictions
  • Biology
  • Birds
  • Catholics
  • Christianity
  • Christmas
  • Conservation
  • Cosmology
  • Cosmos
  • Creationism
  • Crime
  • Cults
  • Culture
  • Delusion
  • Democracy
  • Dogma
  • Evidence
  • Evolution
  • Faith
  • Fallacy
  • Feminism
  • Fraud
  • Freedom
  • Genealogy
  • Genocide
  • Geology
  • Gullibility
  • Health
  • Hindu
  • History
  • Hormones
  • Human Rights
  • Humanism
  • Humour
  • Hypocrisy
  • Intelligence
  • Islam
  • Judaism
  • Language
  • Learning
  • Logic
  • Memes
  • Mental Health
  • Miracles
  • Morality
  • Mormon
  • Music
  • Mythology
  • Nature
  • Oxfam
  • Parasitism
  • Peace
  • Physics
  • Physiology
  • Politics
  • Pope
  • Probability
  • Progress
  • Psychology
  • Qur'an
  • Racism
  • Religion
  • Religious abuse
  • Science
  • Secularism
  • Superstition
  • Theology
  • Vatican
  • Vegetarianism
  • Wildlife
  • Yule

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (201)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ▼  September (26)
      • Unintelligent Design
      • Religion And The History of Censorship
      • Thanks For Your Support
      • How Early Cells May Have Got Complex DNA
      • How Can You Tell A Creationist Is Lying?
      • Suspended Again
      • Religious Sneaks
      • Apologists' Dilemma
      • Fishy Fossil Monogamy
      • Playing With Evolution
      • How The Common Cold Was Intelligently Designed
      • Real Creationists Shouldn't Have Flu Jabs
      • Selfish Genes and Termite Indigestion
      • Rivers Out Of Africa
      • How Thieves Exploit Religious Gullibility
      • Evolving A Quickie
      • Evolution's 'Big Bang' Explained
      • Recent Evolution Underground
      • Even Our Bacteria Show How We Evolved
      • Speaking of Evolution
      • Evolution. It's Enough to Give You Goosebumps
      • God's Haemorrhoids or The Grapes of Wrath
      • Miniature Frog Can Hear With Its Mouth!
      • Brotherly Love - How Christians Settle Disputes
      • Impressions of Paris - Sacré-Cœur
      • Is God Omni-Irrational?
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2012 (269)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (30)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile