Support It

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 4 August 2012

More Infinitely Impossible Gods

Posted on 02:35 by Unknown
Theists who believe in an infinitely omniscient (i.e. all knowing, with special emphasis on the 'all') deity believe in a god which must hold a conceptual model of the entire universe, and, if there are other universes, of all of those as well. This model will need to be constantly updated even to the exact position of every elementary particle and every vibration of every super-string.



Have you ever done that thing with a mirror where you hold it up to another mirror and see a tunnel of diminishing mirrors disappearing into the distance, usually round a bend, unless you're holding the mirror exactly parallel to the other one? This looks like an infinity of mirrors, but there is a lower limit to the size of the image of the mirror you are holding which can be reflected back to you, even if your eyesight is perfect. This is directly related to the wavelength of light. Below that distance, using visible light two objects will appear as one.



Near Beaconsfield, just a short ride west down the M40 from London, UK, is a model village of Bekonscot, reputedly the world's oldest, and as accurate as its creator could make it in 1929. It includes a model of the model village in which there is a model of the model village... and so on, until it becomes a shapeless blob, because, with the best of intentions no one could create accurate buildings, streets, roadside furniture, etc to sufficient detail to be seen by human eyes.



In the theists' god's conceptual model will be a model of itself complete with it conceptual model which will also need to be constantly updated in real time, as will the conceptual model of itself within that conceptual model of itself, and every other infinitely diminishing model within it.



Except of course, because it knows all things, our god can't allow itself the luxury of diminishing models. It can't reduce it's conceptual model to a mere blob or stop at the lower limits of resolution because, being also omniscient, it has no such lower limits, otherwise it will not be all knowing; there would be a limit to it's knowledge.



It's a bit like fractals, only where fractals repeat at a lower level of magnification, an omniscient god's conceptual models will all have to be full-sized.



So, to be omniscient, the theists' god must have an infinite number of conceptual models of the Universe, including itself, itself, all of which are accurate in absolute detail and all of which are being simultaneously and instantly updated. The transfer of information can't be limited by the velocity of light but must be instantaneous, otherwise there would be a period during which the god doesn;t know something.



In fact, because this supposed god is omniscient, it's conceptual model will be indistinguishable from the real thing, as will all the infinity of full-sized models within that conceptual model. And of course the god itself must monitor this infinitely complex conceptual model to keep itself omniscience, as must all the infinite number of gods.



Because they are indistinguishable from the real thing, they will no longer be models. They will be real things, just as a full-sized, accurate in every detail, 'model' of a steam engine, doll's house or village would be a real steam engine, doll's house or village.



So, if the theists' god is omniscient, there must be an infinite number of them in an infinite number of identical universes, each of which contains an infinite number of identical gods in identical full-sized universes... and so ad infinitum.



So, theists, and especially creationists, would you like to explain how a single god can be omniscient and how this infinite complexity (the ultimate Boeing 747) arose without an intelligent designer and with nothing from which to construct it?






Share
Twitter
Tweet
StumbleUpon


Reddit
submit to reddit


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Apologetics, Theology | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Evolution Of A Plague of Locusts
    Magicicada adults and final stage nymphs. Photograph by Arthur D. Guilani If it hasn't happened already, and you live in the Eastern US...
  • Favourite Oxymorons - Religious Logic
    One of the more absurd arguments for religion (in this case Christianity) I've seen today is: "If God doesn't exist then there...
  • The Power Of The Story
    Once upon a time, in a continent not far away, there dwelt a puny ape who had learnt to walk upright so it could see further than other men ...
  • Why Did The Believer Cross The Road?
    Faith: The sure and certain way to know that ever other faith is wrong. Faith is just not a sensible way to live your life. If you tried to...
  • Christians - Try Not To Think About Matthew.
    What was it with Matthew, or whoever it was writing the stuff attributed to him in the Bible? Later on in the Bible, Matthew seems to presen...
  • What is Reddit FOR Exactly?
    Normally, I confine this blog to articles dealing with all aspects of religion, science as it relates to the claims of religion, and occasio...
  • A New Angle On Sex For Creationists
    The extent to which some males will go for sex is amazing, and this has nothing at all to do with dangly things - only females have these an...
  • Christianity Is No Excuse - ECHR
    European Court of Human Rights refuses to hear appeals in three ‘Christian persecution’ cases » British Humanist Association : Congratulatio...
  • Religion Kills - Mormon Massacre
    The Mountain Meadow Massacre To illustrate how readily and easily religions turn their followers into killers in the name of their gods, her...
  • Are The Bible's Publishers Breaking The Law?
    In England we have the Serious Crimes Act 2007 Part 2 of which came into force in 2008. Section 59 removed the Common Law offence of incit...

Categories

  • Agnosticism
  • Anthropology
  • Apologetics
  • Art
  • Astronomy
  • Atheism
  • Bible
  • Bible Contradictions
  • Biology
  • Birds
  • Catholics
  • Christianity
  • Christmas
  • Conservation
  • Cosmology
  • Cosmos
  • Creationism
  • Crime
  • Cults
  • Culture
  • Delusion
  • Democracy
  • Dogma
  • Evidence
  • Evolution
  • Faith
  • Fallacy
  • Feminism
  • Fraud
  • Freedom
  • Genealogy
  • Genocide
  • Geology
  • Gullibility
  • Health
  • Hindu
  • History
  • Hormones
  • Human Rights
  • Humanism
  • Humour
  • Hypocrisy
  • Intelligence
  • Islam
  • Judaism
  • Language
  • Learning
  • Logic
  • Memes
  • Mental Health
  • Miracles
  • Morality
  • Mormon
  • Music
  • Mythology
  • Nature
  • Oxfam
  • Parasitism
  • Peace
  • Physics
  • Physiology
  • Politics
  • Pope
  • Probability
  • Progress
  • Psychology
  • Qur'an
  • Racism
  • Religion
  • Religious abuse
  • Science
  • Secularism
  • Superstition
  • Theology
  • Vatican
  • Vegetarianism
  • Wildlife
  • Yule

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (201)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2012 (269)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ▼  August (21)
      • Inspiring Atheists
      • The Easter Challenge
      • The Historical Evidence For Jesus.
      • Debate: Is There Scientific Evidence Only For The ...
      • How Christian Fundamentalists Lie To Us
      • Saint Augustine's Blunder
      • Matthew's Bad Beatitudes
      • Randomly Refuting Creationism
      • William Lane Craig's Logical Kalamity
      • Christian 'Logic'
      • Feminism
      • The Immoral Bible
      • Why Black Athletic Supremacy Evolved
      • I Have Mail
      • What Jesus Thought About Slavery
      • Makes Perfect Sense!
      • Refuting God With Simple Logic
      • More Infinitely Impossible Gods
      • Evolution For Creationists Who Can Recite Jack & Jill
      • The (Honest) Nicene Creed
      • C.S.Lewis Shows His Double Standards
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2011 (30)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile